data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5c5c/e5c5c8ac5767af7828f63a56aac52b1242ae729c" alt=""
It is clear now that the readjustment try to follow this rule.
The interesting point about this readjustment rule is that it promotes the distribution of wealth. As the country keeps growing, the minimum wage also keeps increasing, at a larger step. Not everyone wage keeps increasing at the minimum wage's rate. It might clearly be apprised in the figure bellow. The cyan curve shows the average wage of Brazilians. If it were to be readjusted using the same rule the minimum wage uses, it would gives us the green curve. Looking at the graphic, we see that the average wage is always bellow the green curve, what shows that, on average, the wages don't follow the minimum wage increase.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24cd2/24cd282231f160f227c6598fbf44d69706e7ce56" alt=""
The consequence of this is better viewed when we normalized all curves by the actual minimum wage value, what is presented in the next figure.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f4bc/3f4bce538908664adc4ca6b02c94b5a9a0d6f763" alt=""
In 1995, the average Brazilian wage was around 8 times greater than the minimum wage. In the last year, in 2009, it reached a ratio 3:1. This means distribution of wealth. Observing the curve, it seems like the curve is going to saturate at a ratio between 3:1 and 2:1, what would leave Brazil in a similar position to developed countries. Here is some ratios of average wage to minimum wage in some countries: USA 3.28:1, Spain 2.55:1, Netherlands 2.22:1, Portugal 2.02:1, France 2.00:1, UK 1.88:1 (data from: source 1 and source 2).
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário